The Nevada child support obligations are set out in Chapter 125B of the Nevada Revised Statutes. Those statutes, and the cases decided pursuant to them, govern who has an obligation, how long the obligation lasts, what the obligation is, when and how the obligation may be modified, and limited issues regarding collection of the obligation.
Basically, all parents have a duty to support their children, regardless of marital status. The duty of support continues until 18 (or 19, if the child is still in high school). It could extend indefinitely for a handicapped child.
Nevada Child Support Formula
The Nevada child support formula is set forth in NRS 125B.070. From 1987 to July, 2002, a parent’s child support obligation was the percent of his or her gross monthly income (18% for one child, 25% for two children, 29% for three children, 31% for four children, and 2% for each additional child above four children), but not more than $500.00 per month, per child.
In 2001, the Nevada Legislature altered these provisions to clarify that the support award must be stated as a sum certain dollar amount corresponding to the relevant percentage, and that, starting in July, 2002, the presumptive maximum amount of the award varied in accordance with the obligor’s gross monthly income. Since that time, the relevant child support “presumptive maximum” changes each year. Medical expenses, including the cost of insurance, is usually to be split between the parents in addition to any support that is paid.
The amount of child support set out in the basic statute, however, may be modified in accordance with a list of statutory factors governing deviation from the statutory percentages. The Nevada Supreme Court has issued a considerable number of opinions discussing when deviation is and is not appropriate.
In the 1998 Wright v. Osburn case, the Nevada Supreme Court held that in 50/50 joint custody cases, child support would offset, so that the parent with the higher income would pay support to the parent with the lower income. In 2003, in Wesley v. Foster, the Court clarified that the offset should take place before, not after, application of the statutory presumptive maximums. And in the 2009 Rivero v. Rivero case, the Court extended that offset calculation to all “joint custody” cases, which it defined as all cases in which the parents share custody 60/40 or closer.
Apparently, as a matter of public policy, child support may not be made non-modifiable, regardless of the agreement of the parties to make it so, as the Nevada Supreme Court held in Ferandez v. Fernandez.
Where the parents are separated, and only one of them has been providing for the child, it is possible to obtain an order for up to four years’ back support. Once a support award has been established, however, amounts that have accrued are generally not retroactively modifiable.
Statutory interest, and certain penalties, accrue on child support that is due but unpaid. Mr. Willick developed the software (known as the “Marshal Law Judgment and Interest Calculator,” or “MLaw”) that is in use throughout this state that calculates the amount of interest and penalties due on unpaid child support. That software is (of course) used in all child support arrearage cases handled by this office, and is available for use at the Clark County self-help center as well. More detail can be found on our Interest & Penalties page.
A special statute called the “Uniform Interstate Family Support Act,” or “UIFSA,” governs the establishment and enforcement of child support orders when the parents live in different States.
WILLICK LAW GROUP has extensive experience in child support cases. Mr. Willick chaired the State Bar of Nevada Committee that reviewed Nevada’s child support laws in 1992 and 1996, and several attorneys of the firm have written and lectured on the subject.
- Percentage of Custodial Time in Typical Custody Schedules
- Worksheet A – Primary Physical Custody Child Support Calculation Worksheet; you will need to print the Presumptive Maximum chart below before filing out this worksheet.
- Worksheet B – Joint Physical Custody Support Calculation Worksheet; you will need to print the Presumptive Maximum chart below before filing out this worksheet.
- Presumptive Maximum Amounts Adjusted for July 1 2013 to June 30, 2014
- Child Support by Hourly Wage 2013-2014 Spreadsheet
- Presumptive Maximum Amounts Adjusted for July 1 2012 to June 30, 2013
- Child Support by Hourly Wage 2012-2013 Spreadsheet
- Presumptive Maximum Amounts Adjusted for July 1 2011 to June 30 2012
- Child Support by Hourly Wage 2011-2012 Spreadsheet
- Presumptive Maximum Amounts Adjusted for July 1 2010 to June 30 2011
- Child Support by Hourly Wage 2010-2011 Spreadsheet
- Presumptive Maximum Amounts Adjusted for July 1 2009 to June 30 2010
- Child Support by Hourly Wage 2009-2010 Spreadsheet
- Presumptive Maximum Amounts Adjusted for July 1 2008 to June 30 2009
- Child Support by Hourly Wage 2008-2009 Spreadsheet
- Presumptive Maximum Amounts of Child Support 2007 to June 30, 2008
- Presumptive Maximum Amounts Adjusted for July 1, 2006 to June 30, 2007
- Presumptive Maximum Amounts Adjusted for July 1 2005 to June 30, 2006
- Child Support Arrears Worksheet
From a CLE in Nevada on Family Law Jurisdiction (Nov. 1, 2012)
- The Basics of Family Law Jurisdiction
- Initial Child Support Jurisdiction
- Child Support Modification Jurisdiction
Other CLE Materials, Articles, and Resources
- Why the Nevada Welfare Division is Calculating Interest and Penalties Incorrectly, and How It Injures Nevada Litigants, 23 Nev. Fam. L. Rep., Winter, 2010
- Child Support Enforcement / Modification Statutes Updated Per SB77 as of October, 2007 (Registration of order for enforcement).
- Three volume 1992 Report of the Child Support Statute Review Committee
- 1992 Report (exhibits)
- One volume 1996 Child Support Statute Committee Report
- What Almost Happened to Child Support in Nevada, a Why We Still Have to Fix It (Nevada Lawyer, 2007)
- Actual Calculation Differences between Marshal Law program and Welfare’s NOMADS program
- Financial Disclosure Form
- Financial Disclosure Form (worksheet 16.2)
- Financial Disclosure Form – exhibit A (2009 Rule 11 Amendments)
- Financial Disclosure Form – exhibit B (2009 NRCP 16.2 Amendments)
- Litigation Budget Form
- Model UIFSA with Comments (2001)
- Required Child(ren) Related Information checklist
- USDA Cost of Raising a Child Calculator
- Self Help Center Brochure
- Fernandez v. Fernandez, 126 Nev. ___, 222 P.3d 1031 (Adv. Opn. No. 3, Feb. 4, 2010) (attempted stipulations to make child support awards non-modifiable are unenforceable as against public policy)